The currently most accurate frequency standards based on optical transitions have reached fractional systematic uncertainties on the order of , enabling sensitive tests of fundamental physics [1]. The Stark shift induced by room temperature blackbody radiation (BBR) in many cases causes the largest shift from the unperturbed transition frequency and limits the systematic uncertainty of the optical clock. For the Yb clock the BBR shift evaluation is limited to the low range by the knowledge of the differential polarizability of the electric octupole (E3) transition at infrared wavelengths, if radiofrequency (rf) traps with small and homogeneous rf heating are used to confine the ion [2].
Measurements of based on the Stark shifts from deliberately applied laser radiation are limited to a fractional uncertainty of about 1% due to the accuracy of optical power meters and imaging properties. For Ca and Sr [3] ions, however, the static differential polarizability has been determined with high accuracy from the specific trap drive frequency at which the micromotion induced second-order Doppler and Stark shift cancel each other. This is possible, because for both ions the clock transition features a negative . Employing this high accuracy, we can use Sr as an in-situ sensor to evaluate the temperature rise from rf losses of an ion trap with low thermal conductivity with 1 K uncertainty [4]. This allows us to determine the unperturbed frequency ratio of the Sr and Yb clock transitions to a fractional uncertainty of and to infer the Sr absolute frequency [4].
To enable frequency uncertainties on the level for Yb, we aim to transfer the uncertainty of Δα from Sr toYb through measuring the light shift induced by a 10 µm CO2 laser beam for 88Sr+ and the two clock transitions of Yb. To minimize the polarizability uncertainty of Sr at 10 µm, we investigate the dynamic behavior of by measuring its zero-crossing around 1540 nm.
[1] S. M. Brewer et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett 123, 033201 (2019)
[2] T. Nordmann et. al., Rev Sci Instrum 91, 11301 (2020)
[3] P. Dubé et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett 112, 173002 (2014)
[4] M. Steinel et. al., arXiv.2212.08687 (2022)